crazy-pages:

colonelingersoll:

vilesbian:

helpimbeingchasedbywaltwhitman:

*writes I LIKE GIRLS on every other page of my journals so future historians don’t try to insist that I’m straight”

Future straight Historians: “we see several examples of her prioritizing a sisterly bond with the women around her, for example on page 12 she says ‘I like girls’ and throughout the text she references loving women and preferring their company. This is not to say she prioritized above her romantic relationships because on page 78 she mentions talking to a man one time in her life. It’s hard to know just how much she valued her sisterly bond with women due to this one reference of men and the ambiguity of early 21st century slang. For example on page 12 when she said she liked women, the passage continues ’…in a lesbian way. I want to kiss girls, they are so pretty, I’m so gay.’ Now it’s difficult to understand just what that sentence means. We know that in the early 21st century kissing on the cheek in greeting had gone out of vogue but the word gay, a word with an archaic meaning of happiness gives the contextual clues that perhaps she is references that old fashioned practice.

Going back to the nameless man that is mentioned once on page 78 for one sentance…”

“Now, given that she wrote on page 12, ‘Just to be clear: I’m sexually and romantically attracted to women exclusively,’ one may be tempted to read this literally, but we can’t rule out sarcasm.”

image

It may seem like @vilesbian is joking, but she really isn’t. 

tchaikovsgay:

definitelynotbritish:

secretlesbians:

Lesbian pulp covers from the 50s and 60s. See more here.
(source)

like the aesthetic is cute but I hate how they’re all “strange desires! abnormal love!”

It’s not like we can pretend the 50s and 60s weren’t Like That

Also, OP’s “see more here” link takes you a really interesting, in-depth post about that very issue. It also provides important context for understanding this part of LGBTQ+ history and representation. A relevant passage:

Because of censorship laws in the US, authors were often forced to write bad endings for their gay heroines (suicide, mental asylums, a return to heterosexuality). But many of the books defied this convention and made bold statements affirming queer identities. In a reprint of Odd Girl Out, Ann Bannon

(the Queen of Lesbian Pulp)

writes about all the women around the US who read her books and wrote to her, recognising themselves in her work. They felt heard for the first time, like they weren’t alone. Without her books and the books of other lesbian pulp writers, literature for queer women probably wouldn’t exist today.

Lesbian pulp is lurid, often unintentionally hilarious, and pretty tame by modern standards, but it can also be really really beautiful. The pre-Stonewall era was fucked up in all kinds of ways, but it did produce some surprising and awesome lesbian fic.

zandorv:

captainsnoop:

thalassarche:

orson-bigdaddy-krennic:

shamblingshitpickle:

PSA: journalists aren’t supposed to put names in the headlines if the person isn’t a public figure. It’s not a matter of maliciously not giving credit

^^^as a journalist, this is something that bothers me ALL THE TIME

A friend of mine on Twitter explained this the other day, so to elaborate based on what she said: If the name is not instantly recognizable the way a public figure is, then putting the name in the headline isn’t going to bring about any sort of recognition or connection in the reader, and doesn’t do much to draw the reader into the story. But something like “local teen” does create a connection by tying the person into the community, and encourages the reader to learn more about what this local teen has done. The name will be in the article itself, after the headline has done its job at getting the reader to look into it.

It’s worth noting too that usually, according to the Inverted Pyramid writing style used for journalism where the most important information is shared first, the person’s name is usually in the first sentence of the first paragraph.

Whenever I see someone get up at arms over a headline that says “Local Teen” and the first comment is “SAY THEIR NAME” I’m always like “hey, thanks for telling every journalist present that you don’t read articles and just skim headlines.” Really makes us feel appreciated.

I think this Onion headline illustrates the point pretty well

blkreginageorge:

demonshauntingcomputers:

marcitlali:

imagine being the first amish bitch in your village to like get your body done like ass shots titties done and like beat face contoured… and then you walked into like the saloon or whatever amish people have and everyone dropped their irish fiddles and was shookedt? like everyone churning butter was just in shock and you walked across the artisanal wood floors in your wantmylook.com thigh high lace up heeled boots like your life depended on it… yes god

my mans jedediah looks away in humility but you KNOW he’s churnin butter that night……milkin a different cow…..

Why y’all doing this when you know the Amish are not here to defend themselves.